Compare/McCormick Intl CX70 vs McCormick Intl MC95

McCormick Intl CX70 vs McCormick Intl MC95

Verdict: McCormick Intl CX70 vs McCormick Intl MC95

The McCormick Intl CX70 and the McCormick Intl MC95 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MC95 leads on rated power with 74 hp against 73 hp. McCormick Intl CX70 is the lighter machine (7,242 kg vs 9,610 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC95 is the newer design (2003 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MC95 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl CX70 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

73 hp

74 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

McCormick IntlReference

liquid-cooled inlineReference

Four ranges with four power shift gears in each range plus creeper.Reference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

155.2 LReference

—

Engine

54.4 kWReference

67.1 kWReference

Displacement

4.2 LReference

4.4 LReference

Bore/Stroke

103 x 127 mmReference

105 x 127 mmReference

Power

54.4 kWReference

67.1 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

271.1 NmReference

387.8 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter

electricReference

Starter volts

12Reference

Emissions

—

Tier 2Reference

Transmission

Gears

24 forward and 12 reverseReference

32 forward and 24 reverseReference

Transmission

—

AutoSpeedReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

creeperReference

partial power shiftReference

SCV flow

60.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

IINReference

Rear lift

2039 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

304mm dry discReference

—

Rear PTO Type

540 (1.375)Reference

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

Engine RPM

540@1954Reference

1000@2200Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

55.2 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

74.9 LReference

Capacity

—

74.9 LReference

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Pump flow

—

109.0 lpmReference

Rear lift (at ends)

—

5870 kgReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

—

3719 kgReference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

223 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

235 cmReference

—

Weight

7242 to 8311 poundsReference

9610 to 11905 poundsReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

10.0/16Reference

2WD Rear tire

13.6R36Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 13.6R36Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2R24. Rear: 13.6R36Reference

—

Length

420 cmReference

429 cmReference

Width

214 cmReference

195 cmReference

2WD Weight

3284 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

3769 kgReference

—

Wheelbase

—

240 cmReference

Rear tire

—

18.4/34Reference

Ag front

—

13.6/28 (4WD)Reference

Ag rear

—

18.4/34Reference

Ground clearance

—

35 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

95Reference

Capacities

Fuel

—

196.8 LReference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.