Compare/McCormick Intl CX80 vs McCormick Intl MC105
Search

McCormick Intl CX80 vs McCormick Intl MC105

Verdict: McCormick Intl CX80 vs McCormick Intl MC105

The McCormick Intl CX80 and the McCormick Intl MC105 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl CX80 leads on rated power with 84 hp against 83 hp. McCormick Intl CX80 is the lighter machine (7,397 kg vs 9,610 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC105 is the newer design (2003 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl CX80 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MC105 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl CX80 Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl MC105 Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
84 hp
83 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
McCormick IntlReference
liquid-cooled inlineReference
Four ranges with four power shift gears in each range plus creeper.Reference
Differential lock
mechanical rearReference
Engine
Fuel tank
155.2 LReference
Engine
62.6 kWReference
76.1 kWReference
Displacement
4.0 LReference
4.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
100 x 127 mmReference
105 x 127 mmReference
Power
62.6 kWReference
76.1 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
325.0 NmReference
414.9 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Emissions
Tier 2Reference
Transmission
Gears
24 forward and 12 reverseReference
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
Transmission
AutoSpeedReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Type
creeperReference
partial power shiftReference
SCV flow
60.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IINReference
Rear lift
2957 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
304mm dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2000Reference
1000@2200Reference
PTO (claimed)
61.9 kWReference
Hydraulic system
74.9 LReference
Capacity
74.9 LReference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Pump flow
109.0 lpmReference
Rear lift (at ends)
5870 kgReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3719 kgReference
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
223 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
235 cmReference
Weight
7397 to 8466 poundsReference
9610 to 11905 poundsReference
Front tire
10.00-16Reference
10.0/16Reference
2WD Rear tire
16.9R34Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 16.9R34Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 12.4R24. Rear: 16.9R34Reference
Length
420 cmReference
429 cmReference
Width
214 cmReference
195 cmReference
2WD Weight
3355 kgReference
4WD Weight
3840 kgReference
Wheelbase
240 cmReference
Rear tire
18.4/34Reference
2WD Ag front
10.0/16Reference
4WD Ag front
13.6/28Reference
Ag rear
18.4/34Reference
Ground clearance
35 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
95Reference
Capacities
Fuel
196.8 LReference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)