Compare/McCormick Intl F105 vs McCormick Intl MC90
Search

McCormick Intl F105 vs McCormick Intl MC90

Verdict: McCormick Intl F105 vs McCormick Intl MC90

The McCormick Intl F105 and the McCormick Intl MC90 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl F105 leads on rated power with 91 hp against 90 hp. McCormick Intl F105 is the lighter machine (5,766 kg vs 10,470 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC90 holds more fuel (196.1 L vs 48.1 L) for longer stints between fills. McCormick Intl F105 is the newer design (2004 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl F105 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MC90 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl F105 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl MC90 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
91 hp
90 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
With 14.9R28 rear tires. Reverse speeds are 3% slower than forward.Reference
With 16.9R38 rear tires and 40 kph transmission option. Creeper range speeds shown.Reference
Differential lock
wet discReference
Variants
F105
standard narrowReference
F105XL
wide deluxeReference
MX90C
similar CaseIH modelReference
Engine
F/GE Fuel tank
73.1 LReference
XL Fuel tank
90.1 LReference
Engine
73.1 kWReference
67.1 kWReference
Displacement
4.4 LReference
4.0 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 127 mmReference
100 x 127 mmReference
Emissions
Tier IIReference
Power
73.1 kWReference
67.1 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
380.1 NmReference
363.0 NmReference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Fuel tank
196.1 LReference
Operating RPM
2000-2200Reference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Oil change
250 hReference
Transmission
Gears
30 forward and reverseReference
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
67.9 kWReference
Type
two-speed power shiftReference
partial power shift with creeperReference
F/GE Valves
2Reference
XL Valves
3Reference
Pump flow
52.2 lpmReference
109.0 lpmReference
Total flow
82.1 lpmReference
Steering flow
29.9 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIINReference
Rear lift
2600 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
wet discReference
electro-hydraulicReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
SCV flow
95.0 lpmReference
Control
electronic lower liftReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3719 kgReference
Engine RPM
1000@2200Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
213 cmReference
242 cmReference
Weight
5766 to 6714 poundsReference
10470 to 11900 poundsReference
Front tire
280/70R20Reference
13.6R28Reference
Rear tire
14.9R28Reference
16.9R38Reference
Ag front
280/70R20Reference
13.6R28Reference
Ag rear
14.9R28Reference
16.9R38Reference
Length
370 cmReference
443 cmReference
Width
124 cmReference
214 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
228 cmReference
Height (Folded ROPS)
139 cmReference
Height (cab)
220 cmReference
278 cmReference
Ground clearance
35 cmReference
35 cmReference
2WD ROPS
2615 kgReference
4WD ROPS
2845 kgReference
2WD Cab
2815 kgReference
4WD Cab
3045 kgReference
Shipping
4749 kgReference
Max front axle
3299 kgReference
Max rear axle
6250 kgReference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
85Reference
95Reference
Ground
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)