Compare/McCormick Intl MC100 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

McCormick Intl MC100 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

Verdict: McCormick Intl MC100 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

The McCormick Intl MC100 and the McCormick Intl MTX120 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MC100 leads on rated power with 102 hp against 101 hp. McCormick Intl MTX120 is the lighter machine (5,900 kg vs 10,470 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MTX120 is the newer design (2004 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MC100 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MTX120 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

102 hp

101 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

McCormick IntlReference

With 16.9R38 rear tires and 40 kph transmission option. Creeper range speeds shown.Reference

Drawbar performanceReference

Differential lock

wet discReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Variants

MX100C

similar CaseIH modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

196.1 LReference

—

Engine

76.1 kWReference

88.0 kWReference

Displacement

4.0 LReference

6.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

104 x 132 mmReference

Power

76.1 kWReference

88.0 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Operating RPM

2000-2200Reference

—

Torque

403.1 NmReference

520.2 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil change

250 hReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

—

64.7 kWReference

Fuel system

—

mechanical injectionReference

Air cleaner

—

dual dry elementReference

Compression

—

17.5:1Reference

Coolant capacity

—

28.5 LReference

Oil capacity

—

75.0 LReference

Max power

—

64.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

75.2 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

32 forward and 24 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

partial power shift with creeperReference

power shiftReference

Pump flow

109.0 lpmReference

SCV flow

95.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIINReference

Control

electronic lower liftReference

electronic lower link draft sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

3719 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2200Reference

—

PTO (claimed)

—

74.6 kWReference

PTO (tested)

—

79.2 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

74.9 LReference

Capacity

—

74.9 LReference

Rear lift

—

5871 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

242 cmReference

272 cmReference

Weight

10470 to 11900 poundsReference

5900 kgReference

Front tire

13.6R28Reference

14.9R28Reference

Rear tire

16.9R38Reference

18.4R38Reference

Ag front

13.6R28Reference

14.9R28Reference

Ag rear

16.9R38Reference

18.4R38Reference

Length

443 cmReference

516 cmReference

Width

214 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

278 cmReference

—

Ground clearance

35 cmReference

—

Shipping

4749 kgReference

—

Max front axle

3299 kgReference

—

Max rear axle

6250 kgReference

—

Operating weight

—

5900 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

95Reference

120Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Speeds

Capacities

Fuel

—

264.9 LReference

Front hubs

—

1.9 LReference

Front diff.

—

2.1 LReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

23.5 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

5847 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.