Compare/McCormick Intl MC110 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m
Search

McCormick Intl MC110 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m

Verdict: McCormick Intl MC110 vs McCormick Intl X50.30m

The McCormick Intl MC110 and the McCormick Intl X50.30m are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MC110 leads on rated power with 83 hp against 82 hp. McCormick Intl X50.30m is the lighter machine (3,323 kg vs 4,844 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC110 holds more fuel (196.1 L vs 102.2 L) for longer stints between fills. McCormick Intl X50.30m is the newer design (2014 vs 2008). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MC110 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl X50.30m if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl MC110 Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl X50.30m Tractor
McCormick Intl
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
83 hp
82 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
Four power shift gears in four ranges with power shuttle. Optional AutoSpeed offers push-button shifting and programmable gear selection.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Final drives
electro-hydraulic rearReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulicReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Trailer brakes
hydraulic (optional)Reference
Engine
Fuel tank
196.1 LReference
102.2 LReference
Engine
75.0 kWReference
Displacement
4.4 LReference
3.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 127 mmReference
99 x 110 mmReference
Emissions
Tier 3Reference
Interim Tier 4Reference
Power
75.0 kWReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Emission control
exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)Reference
Maximum Power
70.8 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Air cleaner
dryReference
Compression
17:1Reference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 12 reverseReference
24 forward and 12 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
61.5 kWReference
60.8 kWReference
Type
four-speed power shiftReference
mechanical shuttleReference
Valves
2 or 3Reference
2Reference
Pump flow
109.0 lpmReference
52.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIINReference
IIReference
Rear lift
5870 kgReference
3692 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Total flow
81.8 lpmReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
251 cmReference
Weight
4844 kgReference
3323 kgReference
Front tire
380/85R28Reference
12.4-24Reference
Rear tire
460/85R38Reference
18.4-30Reference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 380/85R28. Rear: 460/85R38Reference
Front: 12.4-24. Rear: 18.4-30Reference
Length
442 cmReference
413 cmReference
Width
230 cmReference
206 cmReference
Height (cab)
259 cmReference
248 cmReference
Shipping weight
4844 kgReference
Clearance (drawbar)
38 cmReference
2WD Wheelbase
233 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
231 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
254 cmReference
Ground clearance
40 cmReference
Front tread
154 to 195 cmReference
Rear tread
160 to 200 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Variants
X50.30m
utilityReference
X50.20m HC
high-cropReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)