Compare/McCormick Intl MC130 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

McCormick Intl MC130 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

Verdict: McCormick Intl MC130 vs McCormick Intl MTX120

The McCormick Intl MC130 and the McCormick Intl MTX120 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 101 hp. McCormick Intl MC130 is the lighter machine (4,844 kg vs 5,900 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MC130 is the newer design (2008 vs 2004). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

101 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

McCormick IntlReference

Four power shift gears in four ranges with power shuttle. Optional AutoSpeed offers push-button shifting and programmable gear selection.Reference

Drawbar performanceReference

Final drives

electro-hydraulic rearReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

196.1 LReference

—

Engine

92.5 kWReference

88.0 kWReference

Displacement

4.4 LReference

6.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

105 x 127 mmReference

104 x 132 mmReference

Emissions

Tier 3Reference

—

Power

92.5 kWReference

88.0 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Drawbar (tested)

—

64.7 kWReference

Fuel system

—

mechanical injectionReference

Air cleaner

—

dual dry elementReference

Compression

—

17.5:1Reference

Torque

—

520.2 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Coolant capacity

—

28.5 LReference

Oil capacity

—

75.0 LReference

Max power

—

64.7 kWReference

Power at rated engine speed

—

75.2 kWReference

Transmission

Gears

16 forward and 12 reverseReference

32 forward and 24 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

75.5 kWReference

74.6 kWReference

Type

four-speed power shiftReference

power shiftReference

Valves

2 or 3Reference

—

Pump flow

109.0 lpmReference

Rear Type

IIINReference

Rear lift

5870 kgReference

5871 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

PTO (tested)

—

79.2 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

74.9 LReference

Capacity

—

74.9 LReference

Control

—

electronic lower link draft sensingReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

251 cmReference

272 cmReference

Weight

4844 kgReference

5900 kgReference

Front tire

380/85R28Reference

14.9R28Reference

Rear tire

460/85R38Reference

18.4R38Reference

Standard tires (ag)

Front: 380/85R28. Rear: 460/85R38Reference

—

Length

442 cmReference

516 cmReference

Width

230 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

259 cmReference

—

Shipping weight

4844 kgReference

—

Clearance (drawbar)

38 cmReference

—

Ag front

—

14.9R28Reference

Ag rear

—

18.4R38Reference

Operating weight

—

5900 kgReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Charging amps

—

120Reference

Capacities

Fuel

—

264.9 LReference

Front hubs

—

1.9 LReference

Front diff.

—

2.1 LReference

Test results

Fuel use

—

23.5 l/hourReference

Max pull

—

5847 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.