Compare/McCormick Intl MC80 vs McCormick Intl X4.70

McCormick Intl MC80 vs McCormick Intl X4.70

Verdict: McCormick Intl MC80 vs McCormick Intl X4.70

The McCormick Intl MC80 and the McCormick Intl X4.70 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl X4.70 leads on rated power with 85 hp against 84 hp. McCormick Intl X4.70 is the lighter machine (3,193 kg vs 9,921 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl X4.70 is the newer design (2014 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl X4.70 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MC80 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

84 hp

85 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

With 16.9R38 rear tires and 40 kph transmission option. Creeper range speeds shown.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

wet discReference

mechanical optionalReference

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Trailer brakes

—

pneumatic (optional)Reference

Variants

MX80C

similar CaseIH modelReference

—

Engine

Fuel tank

196.1 LReference

—

Engine

62.6 kWReference

75.3 kWReference

Displacement

4.0 LReference

3.6 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

97 x 119 mmReference

Power

62.6 kWReference

75.3 kWReference

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Operating RPM

2000-2200Reference

—

Torque

341.7 NmReference

—

Torque RPM

1400Reference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil change

250 hReference

—

Emissions

—

Tier 4Reference

Maximum Power

—

79.8 kWReference

Compression

—

17.2:1Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Gears

32 forward and 24 reverseReference

24 forward and reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Type

partial power shift with creeperReference

wet discReference

Pump flow

109.0 lpmReference

56.8 lpmReference

SCV flow

95.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

—

Control

electronic lower liftReference

position controlReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

3719 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulicReference

wet discReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2200Reference

—

PTO (claimed)

—

69.4 kWReference

Valves

—

2 to 4Reference

Total flow

—

88.9 lpmReference

Rear lift

—

3891 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

242 cmReference

223 cmReference

Weight

9921 to 11350 poundsReference

3193 kgReference

Front tire

12.4R24Reference

—

Rear tire

16.9R38Reference

—

Ag front

12.4R24Reference

—

Ag rear

16.9R38Reference

—

Length

443 cmReference

431 cmReference

Width

214 cmReference

175 cmReference

Height (cab)

274 cmReference

259 cmReference

Ground clearance

29 cmReference

36 cmReference

Shipping

4500 kgReference

—

Max front axle

2899 kgReference

—

Max rear axle

6250 kgReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

—

Charging amps

95Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.