Compare/McCormick Intl MTX120 vs McCormick Intl X50.50
Search

McCormick Intl MTX120 vs McCormick Intl X50.50

Verdict: McCormick Intl MTX120 vs McCormick Intl X50.50

The McCormick Intl MTX120 and the McCormick Intl X50.50 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MTX120 leads on rated power with 101 hp against 98 hp. McCormick Intl MTX120 is the lighter machine (5,900 kg vs 8,030 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl X50.50 is the newer design (2012 vs 2004). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MTX120 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl X50.50 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl MTX120 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl X50.50 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
101 hp
98 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick IntlReference
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
Drawbar performanceReference
liquid-cooledReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Engine
88.0 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
64.7 kWReference
Displacement
6.8 LReference
3.4 LReference
Bore/Stroke
104 x 132 mmReference
99 x 110 mmReference
Power
88.0 kWReference
Fuel system
mechanical injectionReference
direct injectionReference
Air cleaner
dual dry elementReference
dryReference
Compression
17.5:1Reference
17:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
520.2 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1400Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Coolant capacity
28.5 LReference
Oil capacity
75.0 LReference
Max power
64.7 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
75.2 kWReference
Fuel tank
102.2 LReference
Emissions
Interim Tier 4Reference
Emission control
exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)Reference
Maximum Power
84.3 kWReference
Starter
electricReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
32 forward and 12 reverseReference
Transmission
XtraspeedReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
74.6 kWReference
72.7 kWReference
PTO (tested)
79.2 kWReference
Hydraulic system
74.9 LReference
Type
power shiftReference
three-speed power shift with power shuttleReference
Capacity
74.9 LReference
Pump flow
109.0 lpmReference
52.2 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIINReference
IIReference
Control
electronic lower link draft sensingReference
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift
5871 kgReference
4740 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulicReference
wet discsReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/750/1000Reference
Valves
2 to 4Reference
Total flow
81.8 lpmReference
Front Hitch
optionalReference
Front lift
1796 kgReference
Front PTO
independent (optional)Reference
Capacities
Fuel
264.9 LReference
Front hubs
1.9 LReference
Front diff.
2.1 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
272 cmReference
Weight
5900 kgReference
3841 kgReference
Front tire
14.9R28Reference
380/70R24Reference
Rear tire
18.4R38Reference
480/70R34Reference
Ag front
14.9R28Reference
Ag rear
18.4R38Reference
Length
516 cmReference
416 cmReference
Operating weight
5900 kgReference
2WD Wheelbase
236 cmReference
4WD Wheelbase
233 cmReference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 380/70R24. Rear: 480/70R34Reference
Width
210 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
255 cmReference
Height (cab)
256 cmReference
Ground clearance
46 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
120Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
23.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
5847 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)