Compare/McCormick Intl MTX125 vs McCormick Intl MTX135
Search

McCormick Intl MTX125 vs McCormick Intl MTX135

Verdict: McCormick Intl MTX125 vs McCormick Intl MTX135

The McCormick Intl MTX125 and the McCormick Intl MTX135 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MTX135 leads on rated power with 113 hp against 112 hp. McCormick Intl MTX135 is the lighter machine (6,001 kg vs 12,020 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MTX135 is the newer design (2004 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MTX135 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MTX125 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
McCormick Intl MTX125 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
McCormick Intl MTX135 Tractor
McCormick Intl
85
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
112 hp
113 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference
McCormick IntlReference
Four power shift gears in four ranges.Reference
Drawbar performanceReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulic rearReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
264.9 LReference
264.9 LReference
Engine
96.9 kWReference
97.7 kWReference
Drawbar (claimed)
73.8 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
73.9 kWReference
71.0 kWReference
Displacement
6.0 LReference
6.8 LReference
Bore/Stroke
100 x 127 mmReference
104 x 132 mmReference
Power
96.9 kWReference
97.7 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
dual dry elementReference
Compression
17.2:1Reference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Torque
516.1 NmReference
353.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1400Reference
1400Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil change
300 hReference
Max power
73.9 kWReference
71.0 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
83.5 kWReference
84.1 kWReference
Fuel system
mechanical injectionReference
Transmission
Gears
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
32 forward and 24 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
83.5 kWReference
83.5 kWReference
PTO (tested)
85.1 kWReference
85.1 kWReference
Type
creeperReference
four-speed power shiftReference
Pump flow
109.0 lpmReference
109.0 lpmReference
SCV flow
95.0 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
IIINReference
Control
electronic lower link draft sensingReference
electronic lower link draft sensingReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
4617 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Engine RPM
1000@2200Reference
Rear lift
5871 kgReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
270 cmReference
272 cmReference
Weight
12020 to 13620 poundsReference
6001 kgReference
Front tire
14.9R28Reference
14.9R28Reference
Rear tire
18.4R38Reference
18.4R38Reference
Ag front
14.9R28Reference
14.9R28Reference
Ag rear
18.4R38Reference
18.4R38Reference
Length
516 cmReference
516 cmReference
Width
230 cmReference
Height (cab)
288 cmReference
Shipping
5452 kgReference
Max front axle
6100 kgReference
Max rear axle
9498 kgReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
95Reference
120 (optional)Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Test results
Fuel use
29.1 l/hourReference
25.0 l/hourReference
Max pull
6536 kgReference
5942 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)