Compare/McCormick Intl MTX140 vs McCormick Intl MTX150

McCormick Intl MTX140 vs McCormick Intl MTX150

Verdict: McCormick Intl MTX140 vs McCormick Intl MTX150

The McCormick Intl MTX140 and the McCormick Intl MTX150 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. McCormick Intl MTX150 leads on rated power with 130 hp against 127 hp. McCormick Intl MTX150 is the lighter machine (6,160 kg vs 12,130 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. McCormick Intl MTX150 is the newer design (2004 vs 2000). In short: choose the McCormick Intl MTX150 for outright pulling power, or the McCormick Intl MTX140 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

McCormick Intl

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

127 hp

130 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

McCormick Intl (a part of Argo)Reference

McCormick IntlReference

Four power shift gears in four ranges.Reference

liquid-cooledReference

Differential lock

electro-hydraulic rearReference

—

Steering

—

hydrostatic powerReference

Engine

Fuel tank

264.9 LReference

Engine

108.1 kWReference

113.3 kWReference

Drawbar (claimed)

82.0 kWReference

—

Drawbar (tested)

82.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

6.0 LReference

6.8 LReference

Bore/Stroke

100 x 127 mmReference

104 x 132 mmReference

Power

108.1 kWReference

113.3 kWReference

Air cleaner

dual paper elementsReference

dual dry elementReference

Compression

17.2:1Reference

—

Rated RPM

2200Reference

Torque

588.1 NmReference

582.1 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter

electricReference

—

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil change

300 hReference

—

Max power

82.2 kWReference

—

Power at rated engine speed

94.8 kWReference

—

Fuel system

—

mechanical injectionReference

Transmission

Gears

32 forward and 24 reverseReference

Transmission

—

powershiftReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

94.7 kWReference

96.9 kWReference

PTO (tested)

95.3 kWReference

—

Type

creeperReference

pressure flow compensatingReference

Pump flow

109.0 lpmReference

SCV flow

95.0 lpmReference

—

Rear Type

IIReference

IIINReference

Control

electronic lower link draft sensingReference

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)

4617 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

independentReference

Clutch

electro-hydraulic wet discReference

electro-hydraulicReference

Rear PTO Type

540/1000 (1.375)Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

1000@2200Reference

—

Rear lift

—

6603 kgReference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

270 cmReference

272 cmReference

Weight

12130 to 14205 poundsReference

6160 kgReference

Front tire

16.9R28Reference

Rear tire

20.8R38Reference

Ag front

16.9R28Reference

Ag rear

20.8R38Reference

Length

516 cmReference

Width

230 cmReference

—

Height (cab)

292 cmReference

—

Shipping

5502 kgReference

—

Max front axle

6100 kgReference

—

Max rear axle

9498 kgReference

—

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

95Reference

120 (optional)Reference

Battery volts

12Reference

Test results

Fuel use

417.1 l/hourReference

—

Max pull

6974 kgReference

—

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.