Compare/Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D vs Minneapolis-Moline UTU
Search

Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D vs Minneapolis-Moline UTU

Verdict: Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D vs Minneapolis-Moline UTU

The Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D and the Minneapolis-Moline UTU are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D leads on rated power with 40 hp against 35 hp. Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D is the newer design (1952 vs 1938). In short: choose the Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D for outright pulling power, or the Minneapolis-Moline UTU if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Minneapolis-Moline UTS-D Tractor
Minneapolis-Moline
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Minneapolis-Moline UTU Tractor
Minneapolis-Moline
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
40 hp
35 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
Minneapolis-MolineReference
Minneapolis-MolineReference
liquid-cooledReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Total built
2404Reference
33,268Reference
Steering
manualReference
Variants
UTU
row-crop tricycleReference
row-crop tricycleReference
UTE
row-crop wide frontReference
row-crop wide frontReference
UTN
row-crop single frontReference
row-crop single frontReference
UDU
diesel row-cropReference
diesel row-cropReference
UTS-D
diesel standardReference
diesel standardReference
UTC
high-cropReference
high-cropReference
UTS
standard-frontReference
standard-frontReference
UDLX
Comfotractor with cabReference
Comfotractor with cabReference
UOPN
Comfotractor roadsterReference
UTIL
industrial with shuttle shiftReference
industrial with shuttle shiftReference
UTIL-M
militaryReference
militaryReference
UTOX
Comfotractor roadsterReference
Engine
Drawbar (claimed)
29.8 kWReference
Displacement
4.6 LReference
4.6 LReference
Bore/Stroke
108 x 127 mmReference
108 x 127 mmReference
Rated RPM
1300Reference
1275Reference
Fuel tank
81.4 LReference
Drawbar (tested)
26.2 kWReference
Belt (tested)
31.8 kWReference
Compression
5.4:1Reference
Coolant capacity
22.7 LReference
Belt power (max)
27.8 kWReference
Max power
25.0 kWReference
Transmission
Type
gearReference
unsynchronized gearReference
Gears
5 forward and 1 reverseReference
5 forward and 1 reverseReference
Clutch
mechanical dry discReference
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
205 cmReference
223 cmReference
Front tire
7.50-16Reference
6.00x16Reference
Rear tire
12.75-32Reference
11.00x36Reference
Ag front
7.50-16Reference
6.00x16Reference
Ag rear
12.75-32Reference
11.00x36Reference
Length
342 cmReference
354 cmReference
Width
191 cmReference
214 cmReference
Height
149 cmReference
179 cmReference
Weight
2494 kgReference
Ballasted weight
3039 kgReference
Rear tread
137 to 210 cmReference
UTS-D Serial Numbers
1952
05000001Reference
01110118Reference
1953
--------Reference
---Reference
1954
05000019Reference
01113450Reference
1955
05000955Reference
01113454Reference
1956
05002105Reference
Final
05002404Reference
01113456Reference
UTU Serial Number Location
UTU Serial Numbers
1938
310026Reference
1939
310647Reference
1940
312451Reference
1941
314893Reference
1942
316501Reference
1943
317702Reference
1944
318163Reference
1945
321102Reference
1946
325231Reference
1947
329752Reference
1948
0114800001Reference
1949
0114900001Reference
1950
0115000001Reference
1951
01105384Reference
Capacities
Diameter
39 cmReference
RPM
733Reference
Speed
906.78 meters/minReference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
16.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
2246 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)