Compare/Mitsubishi GSK255 vs Mitsubishi MT300
Search

Mitsubishi GSK255 vs Mitsubishi MT300

Verdict: Mitsubishi GSK255 vs Mitsubishi MT300

The Mitsubishi GSK255 and the Mitsubishi MT300 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Both are rated at the same 26 hp. Mitsubishi MT300 is the lighter machine (2,337 kg vs 2,877 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Mitsubishi GSK255 is the newer design (2013 vs 1984). Use the full side-by-side spec tables below to weigh the details against your own operation, and confirm with a dealer demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Mitsubishi GSK255 Tractor
Mitsubishi
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Mitsubishi MT300 Tractor
Mitsubishi
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
26 hp
26 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
MitsubishiReference
MitsubishiReference
Reverse speeds are 15% slower than forward.Reference
Three gears (1-3) plus reverse (R) in three ranges (low/medium/high). Optional creeper range.Reference
Drive
half-trackReference
Differential lock
rear standardReference
Steering
powerReference
Variants
GS251
wheeled ROPSReference
GS251X
wheeled cabReference
GSK255
half-trackReference
MT300
2WDReference
MT300D
4WDReference
Engine
Fuel tank
25.0 LReference
Engine
19.5 kWReference
22.4 kWReference
Displacement
1.5 LReference
1.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
86 x 86 mmReference
84 x 90 mmReference
Power
19.5 kWReference
22.4 kWReference
Rated RPM
2500Reference
2700Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Air cleaner
dry elementReference
Transmission
Gears
12 forward and reverseReference
infinite forward and reverseReference
Clutch
dry discReference
PTO & Hydraulics
Rear Type
JIS0Reference
IReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
Engine RPM
-1224@2500Reference
1000@2353Reference
PTO (claimed)
19.4 kWReference
Type
hydrostaticReference
Pump flow
21.6 lpmReference
Steering flow
7.2 lpmReference
Control
draft controlReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
Dimensions
ROPS Wheelbase
150 cmReference
Cab Wheelbase
154 cmReference
Weight
2877 to 3296 poundsReference
2337 to 2558 poundsReference
Front tire
7-14Reference
5.00-15Reference
Rear tire
tracksReference
Ag front
7-14Reference
Ag rear
400mm tracksReference
ROPS Length
283 cmReference
Cab Length
289 cmReference
Width
143 cmReference
140 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
199 cmReference
Height (cab)
199 cmReference
ROPS Weight
1305 kgReference
Cab Weight
1495 kgReference
Ground clearance
41 cmReference
Front tread
96 cmReference
Rear tread
103 cmReference
101 to 152 cmReference
Wheelbase
157 cmReference
2WD Rear tire
12.4-24Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 5.00-15. Rear: 12.4-24Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 7-16. Rear: 12.4-24Reference
2WD Lawn/turf front
20x8.00-10Reference
4WD Lawn/turf front
6-14Reference
Lawn/turf rear
13.6-16Reference
Length
293 cmReference
4WD Height
141 cmReference
2WD Height
142 cmReference
2WD Weight
1060 kgReference
4WD Weight
1160 kgReference
4WD Ground clearance
27 cmReference
2WD Ground clearance
34 cmReference
2WD Front tread
107 to 133 cmReference
4WD Front tread
119 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)