Compare/New Holland T9.450 vs New Holland TJ375
Search

New Holland T9.450 vs New Holland TJ375

Verdict: New Holland T9.450 vs New Holland TJ375

The New Holland T9.450 and the New Holland TJ375 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. New Holland T9.450 leads on rated power with 355 hp against 338 hp. New Holland TJ375 holds more fuel (1135.5 L vs 870.6 L) for longer stints between fills. New Holland T9.450 is the newer design (2011 vs 2002). In short: choose the New Holland T9.450 for outright pulling power, or the New Holland TJ375 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
New Holland T9.450 Tractor
New Holland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
New Holland TJ375 Tractor
New Holland
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
355 hp
338 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
New HollandReference
New HollandReference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Gear 1 used for pull test.Reference
Final drives
inboard planetaryReference
Steering
hydrostatic powerReference
Engine
Fuel tank
1230.1 LReference
1135.5 LReference
Exhaust fluid (DEF)
174.1 LReference
Engine
302.0 kWReference
279.6 kWReference
Drawbar (tested)
245.0 kWReference
234.1 kWReference
Displacement
12.9 LReference
14.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
135 x 150 mmReference
137 x 169 mmReference
Emissions
Interim Tier 4Reference
Emission control
selective catalytic reduction (SCR)Reference
Power
302.0 kWReference
279.6 kWReference
Maximum Power
332.6 kWReference
Rated RPM
2100Reference
2000Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
24Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
30.9 LReference
49.2 LReference
Coolant capacity
79.9 LReference
79.9 LReference
Max power
245.0 kWReference
234.1 kWReference
Power at rated engine speed
264.6 kWReference
252.0 kWReference
Air cleaner
dual paper elementsReference
Compression
16.5:1Reference
Torque
1871.3 NmReference
Transmission
Gears
16 forward and 2 reverseReference
24 forward and 6 reverseReference
Clutch
electro-hydraulic wet discReference
Transmission
synchroshiftReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (tested)
298.4 kWReference
288.3 kWReference
Type
full power shiftReference
full power shiftReference
Pressure
137.9 barReference
Rear valves
4 to 8Reference
4 to 7Reference
Pump flow
170.3 lpmReference
Total flow
427.7 lpmReference
340.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
4N/3Reference
IVN/IIIReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
9072 kgReference
8845 kgReference
Rear PTO
optionalReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
1000 (1-3/4)Reference
1000 (1.75)Reference
Power at rated PTO speed
291.2 kWReference
PTO (claimed)
246.1 kWReference
SCV flow
132.5 lpmReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
375 cmReference
391 cmReference
Length
749 cmReference
806 cmReference
Width
92 cmReference
Height
366 cmReference
386 cmReference
Front axle
127 by 3048 mmReference
114 mmReference
Max Drawbar
4989 kgReference
Weight
17059 kgReference
Front tire
18.4R46Reference
Rear tire
18.4R46Reference
Ag front
18.4R46Reference
Ag rear
18.4R46Reference
Operating weight
17059 kgReference
Bar rear axle
114 mmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
alternatorReference
Charging amps
200Reference
185Reference
Batteries
2Reference
Battery CCA
1000Reference
1000Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Capacities
Max capacity
22453 kgReference
Test results
Fuel use
81.8 l/hourReference
72.3 l/hourReference
Max pull
18072 kgReference
15267 kgReference
Variants
STX375
similar CaseIH modelReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)