Search
Oliver 1355 vs Oliver 770
Verdict: Oliver 1355 vs Oliver 770
The Oliver 1355 and the Oliver 770 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Oliver 1355 leads on rated power with 51 hp against 47 hp. Oliver 770 is the lighter machine (2,494 kg vs 4,410 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Oliver 1355 is the newer design (1969 vs 1958). In short: choose the Oliver 1355 for outright pulling power, or the Oliver 770 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.
Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Oliver
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Oliver
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
51 hp
47 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
—
—
Overview
Distributor
OliverReference
—
Manufacturer
FiatReference
OliverReference
With 14.9-30 rear tires.Reference
Diesel 6-speed 2WDApril 23 - May 7, 1958Link: Nebraska Tractor Test 649 fileReference
Steering
powerReference
—
Engine
Displacement
3.1 LReference
3.5 LReference
Bore/Stroke
95 x 110 mmReference
89 x 95 mmReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
—
Air cleaner
oil bathReference
—
Compression
17:1Reference
16:1Reference
Rated RPM
2400Reference
1750Reference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Oil capacity
18.0 LReference
—
Coolant capacity
13.2 LReference
17.0 LReference
Gas Fuel tank
—
76.8 LReference
Diesel Fuel tank
—
68.9 LReference
Plows
—
3-4Reference
Drawbar (tested)
—
33.1 kWReference
Belt (tested)
—
37.3 kWReference
Belt power (max)
—
36.4 kWReference
Max power
—
33.1 kWReference
Transmission
Type
creeperReference
sliding gearReference
Gears
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
12 forward and 4 reverseReference
Clutch
279.4mm dry discReference
dry discReference
Transmission
—
Power-BoosterReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
38.0 kWReference
35.0 kWReference
Hydraulic system
18.0 LReference
—
Capacity
18.0 LReference
—
Pressure
147.1 barReference
—
Pump flow
45.4 lpmReference
—
Rear Type
II/IReference
I/IIReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
—
Rear lift
1406 kgReference
—
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Rear PTO Type
540 (1.375)Reference
—
Capacities
Fuel
53.9 LReference
—
Dimensions
2WD Wheelbase
207 cmReference
—
4WD Wheelbase
198 cmReference
—
Weight
4410 to 4940 poundsReference
2494 kgReference
Front tire
6.00-16Reference
6.00-16Reference
Rear tire
14.9-28Reference
15.5-38Reference
2WD Ag front
6.00-16Reference
—
4WD Ag front
9.50-24Reference
—
2WD Ag rear
14.9-28Reference
—
4WD Ag rear
16.9-30Reference
—
Ag front
7.50-10Reference
6.00-16Reference
Ag rear
18.4-16AReference
15.5-38Reference
2WD Length
309 cmReference
—
4WD Length
322 cmReference
—
2WD Width
177 cmReference
—
4WD Width
182 cmReference
—
2WD Height (steering wheel)
153 cmReference
—
4WD Height (steering wheel)
160 cmReference
—
2WD Shipping weight
2000 kgReference
—
4WD Shipping weight
2240 kgReference
—
2WD Clearance (front axle)
47 cmReference
—
4WD Clearance (front axle)
27 cmReference
—
Operating weight
—
2494 kgReference
Ballasted weight
—
4134 kgReference
1355 Serial Numbers
1969
505-287Reference
—
1970
512-698Reference
—
1971
523-254Reference
—
Location:
Serial number plate below the steering column.Reference
Bottom of dashboard below steering wheel.Reference
Final
526-640Reference
193365 (47 prefix)Reference
Electrical
Charging system
alternatorReference
generatorReference
Charging amps
42Reference
—
Batteries
2Reference
—
Battery volts
6Reference
12Reference
Ground
—
positiveReference
Speeds
Variants
Wheatland
—
standard front axle (wide)Reference
High-crop
—
high-clearance modelReference
Orchard
—
low profile modelReference
770 Serial Numbers
1958
—
60504Reference
1959
—
71001Reference
1960
—
84554Reference
1961
—
111472Reference
1962
—
117600Reference
1963
—
127319Reference
1964
—
141901Reference
1965
—
153255Reference
1966
—
171515Reference
1967
—
183649Reference
Test results
Belt fuel use (max)
—
12.9 l/hourReference
Max pull
—
3237 kgReference
Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.