Compare/UTB/Universal 530 vs UTB/Universal 533

UTB/Universal 530 vs UTB/Universal 533

Verdict: UTB/Universal 530 vs UTB/Universal 533

The UTB/Universal 530 and the UTB/Universal 533 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. UTB/Universal 530 leads on rated power with 50 hp against 47 hp. UTB/Universal 530 is the lighter machine (4,000 kg vs 5,765 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. UTB/Universal 533 holds more fuel (62.1 L vs 54.1 L) for longer stints between fills. UTB/Universal 533 is the newer design (1988 vs 1982). In short: choose the UTB/Universal 530 for outright pulling power, or the UTB/Universal 533 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

UTB/Universal

Fit score

Best match

Clear

UTB/Universal

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

50 hp

47 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

UTB/UniversalReference

With 14.9x28 rear tires. Reverse speeds are 15% faster than forward.Reference

Optional creeper adds a third range to the basic transmission.Reference

Differential lock

mechanical rearReference

Variants

530DT

4WDReference

—

533DT

—

4WDReference

Engine

Fuel tank

54.1 LReference

62.1 LReference

Engine

39.5 kWReference

Displacement

2.7 LReference

3.2 LReference

Bore/Stroke

102 x 110 mmReference

Power

39.5 kWReference

Fuel system

direct injectionReference

—

Compression

17:1Reference

Rated RPM

2400Reference

Torque

177.6 NmReference

167.1 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Starter power

3.0 kWReference

—

Air cleaner

—

oil bathReference

Oil capacity

—

23.0 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

13.0 LReference

Transmission

Gears

8 forward and reverseReference

12 forward and 3 reverseReference

Clutch

279.4mm dry discReference

dry discReference

PTO & Hydraulics

PTO (claimed)

37.3 kWReference

35.0 kWReference

Type

shuttleReference

creeperReference

Valves

1Reference

—

Pump flow

34.4 lpmReference

34.1 lpmReference

Rear Type

II/IReference

Control

position and draft controlReference

—

Rear lift

1202 kgReference

—

Rear PTO

liveReference

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540Reference

540/1000Reference

Engine RPM

—

1000@2400Reference

Dimensions

Wheelbase

195 cmReference

211 cmReference

Weight

4000 to 4800 poundsReference

5765 to 6393 poundsReference

Front tire

7.50-16Reference

6.00-16Reference

Rear tire

12.4-36Reference

—

Ag front

9.5-24 (4WD)Reference

—

Ag rear

12.4-36Reference

—

Length

318 cmReference

363 cmReference

Height

250 cmReference

248 cmReference

2WD Weight

1814 kgReference

2615 kgReference

4WD Weight

2177 kgReference

2899 kgReference

2WD Rear tire

—

14.9R28Reference

2WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 6.00-16. Rear: 14.9R28Reference

4WD Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 9.5/8-24. Rear: 12.4R-36Reference

UTB/Universal 530 attachments

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

—

Charging system

alternatorReference

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

—

150Reference

Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.