Compare/Valmet 604T vs Valmet 78 Viking

Valmet 604T vs Valmet 78 Viking

Verdict: Valmet 604T vs Valmet 78 Viking

The Valmet 604T and the Valmet 78 Viking are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Valmet 604T leads on rated power with 66 hp against 65 hp. Valmet 78 Viking is the lighter machine (2,959 kg vs 6,217 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Valmet 604T is the newer design (1982 vs 1981). In short: choose the Valmet 604T for outright pulling power, or the Valmet 78 Viking if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Valmet

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Valmet

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Rated power

66 hp

65 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

ValmetReference

With 16.9-30 rear tires.Reference

With 18.4-30 rear tires.Reference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

65.1 LReference

—

Engine

49.2 kWReference

—

Displacement

3.3 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

102 x 120 mmReference

Power

49.2 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2300Reference

2200Reference

Starter volts

12Reference

Oil capacity

7.5 LReference

9.5 LReference

Coolant capacity

10.0 LReference

11.8 LReference

Air cleaner

—

oil bathReference

Torque

—

259.8 NmReference

Torque RPM

—

1400Reference

Starter

—

electricReference

Transmission

Type

partially synchronizedReference

synchronizedReference

Gears

6 forward and 2 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Pump flow

38.6 lpmReference

25.4 lpmReference

Rear lift

1900 kgReference

1500 kgReference

Rear PTO Type

540Reference

540 (1.375)Reference

PTO (claimed)

—

48.5 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

17.0 LReference

Capacity

—

17.0 LReference

Pressure

—

160.5 barReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Rear PTO

—

independentReference

Engine RPM

—

540@1720Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

211 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

217 cmReference

—

Weight

6217 to 6415 poundsReference

2959 kgReference

Front tire

10.00-16Reference

7.50-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

16.9-30Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-30Reference

—

2WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 13.6-36Reference

—

4WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 13.6-36Reference

—

2WD Length

361 cmReference

—

4WD Length

370 cmReference

—

Width

210 cmReference

197 cmReference

Height

252 cmReference

—

2WD Weight

2820 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

2909 kgReference

—

2WD Ground clearance

45 cmReference

—

4WD Ground clearance

40 cmReference

—

Wheelbase

—

219 cmReference

Rear tire

—

18.4-30Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 18.4-30Reference

Length

—

405 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

251 cmReference

Clearance (drawbar)

—

45 cmReference

Front tread

—

140 to 181 cmReference

Rear tread

—

151 to 209 cmReference

Electrical

Ground

negativeReference

Charging system

alternatorReference

Charging amps

34Reference

23Reference

Charging volts

13.5Reference

—

Battery volts

12Reference

Battery AH

130Reference

135Reference

Speeds

Capacities

Fuel

—

79.9 LReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.