Compare/Valmet 900 vs Valmet 985

Valmet 900 vs Valmet 985

Verdict: Valmet 900 vs Valmet 985

The Valmet 900 and the Valmet 985 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Valmet 900 leads on rated power with 90 hp against 88 hp. Valmet 985 is the lighter machine (3,329 kg vs 7,408 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. In short: choose the Valmet 900 for outright pulling power, or the Valmet 985 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score

Tell us about your operation

Acreage600 acBudgetMain crop / use

Fit & specs

Valmet

Fit score

Best match

Clear

Valmet

Fit score

Clear

Rated power

90 hp

88 hp

Confidence

40%

Guide price

—

Overview

Manufacturer

ValmetReference

With 16.9R34 rear tires.Reference

With 18.4x34 rear tires.Reference

Final drives

—

planetaryReference

Differential lock

—

mechanical rearReference

Engine

Fuel tank

73.1 LReference

—

Engine

67.1 kWReference

—

Displacement

4.4 LReference

3.9 LReference

Bore/Stroke

108 x 120 mmReference

102 x 120 mmReference

Power

67.1 kWReference

—

Rated RPM

2270Reference

2300Reference

Torque

349.8 NmReference

371.5 NmReference

Torque RPM

1400Reference

1500Reference

Air cleaner

—

dryReference

Starter

—

electricReference

Starter volts

—

12Reference

Oil capacity

—

9.5 LReference

Coolant capacity

—

12.0 LReference

Transmission

Type

creeperReference

synchronizedReference

Gears

12 forward and 8 reverseReference

8 forward and 4 reverseReference

PTO & Hydraulics

Valves

2Reference

Pump flow

51.9 lpmReference

Rear lift

3299 kgReference

2590 kgReference

Rear PTO

independentReference

Rear PTO Type

540/540EReference

540 (1.375)Reference

Front PTO Type

1000Reference

—

PTO (claimed)

—

65.6 kWReference

Hydraulic system

—

68.1 LReference

Capacity

—

68.1 LReference

Pressure

—

176.5 barReference

Rear Type

—

IIReference

Control

—

position and draft controlReference

Engine RPM

—

540@1860Reference

Dimensions

2WD Wheelbase

224 cmReference

—

4WD Wheelbase

238 cmReference

—

Weight

7408 to 7915 poundsReference

3329 kgReference

Front tire

11.00-16Reference

9.00-16Reference

2WD Rear tire

18.4R34Reference

—

2WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4R34Reference

—

4WD Standard tires (ag)

Front: 14.9R24. Rear: 18.4R34Reference

—

2WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 10.00-16. Rear: 16.9R30Reference

—

4WD Optional tires (ag)

Front: 13.6R24. Rear: 16.9R34Reference

—

2WD Length

387 cmReference

—

4WD Length

404 cmReference

—

Width

217 cmReference

210 cmReference

2WD Height (cab)

269 cmReference

—

4WD Height (cab)

270 cmReference

—

2WD Weight

3360 kgReference

—

4WD Weight

3590 kgReference

—

2WD Clearance (front axle)

50 cmReference

—

4WD Clearance (front axle)

47 cmReference

—

Clearance (rear axle)

49 cmReference

—

Wheelbase

—

236 cmReference

Rear tire

—

18.4-34Reference

Standard tires (ag)

—

Front: 9.00-16. Rear: 18.4-34Reference

Length

—

446 cmReference

Height (ROPS)

—

264 cmReference

Clearance (drawbar)

—

37 cmReference

Front tread

—

152 to 209 cmReference

Rear tread

—

152 to 213 cmReference

Speeds

Capacities

Fuel

—

134.7 LReference

Electrical

Ground

—

negativeReference

Charging system

—

alternatorReference

Charging amps

—

65Reference

Battery volts

—

12Reference

Battery AH

—

90Reference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.