Compare/White 6090 vs White 80
Search

White 6090 vs White 80

Verdict: White 6090 vs White 80

The White 6090 and the White 80 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. White 80 leads on rated power with 81 hp against 80 hp. White 6090 is the lighter machine (3,552 kg vs 4,159 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. White 6090 is the newer design (1992 vs 1989). In short: choose the White 80 for outright pulling power, or the White 6090 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
White 6090 Tractor
White
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
White 80 Tractor
White
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
80 hp
81 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Distributor
White (a part of AGCO)Reference
Manufacturer
SAMEReference
WhiteReference
liquid-cooledReference
The optional power shift transmission add a three-speed power shift to the basic six-speed transmission.Reference
Engine
Displacement
4.0 LReference
3.9 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 116 mmReference
102 x 120 mmReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Compression
17.1:1Reference
Rated RPM
2500Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Drawbar (tested)
50.8 kWReference
Pre-heating
ether kitReference
Oil capacity
49.2 LReference
Coolant capacity
22.7 LReference
Power at rated engine speed
60.8 kWReference
Max power
50.8 kWReference
Transmission
Gears
20 forward and reverseReference
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
59.7 kWReference
59.7 kWReference
Hydraulic system
65.1 LReference
49.2 LReference
Type
synchromeshReference
partial power shiftReference
Capacity
65.1 LReference
49.2 LReference
Pressure
180.0 barReference
151.7 barReference
Valves
1 or 2Reference
1 to 3Reference
Pump flow
59.8 lpmReference
Total flow
82.5 lpmReference
75.7 lpmReference
Rear Type
II/IReference
II/IReference
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2919 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
dry discReference
dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000Reference
540/1000Reference
PTO (tested)
60.8 kWReference
Control
lower linkReference
Rear lift
2268 kgReference
Engine RPM
1000@2217Reference
Capacities
Fuel
85.2 LReference
75.7 LReference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
230 cmReference
242 cmReference
Weight
3552 kgReference
4159 kgReference
Length
430 cmReference
387 cmReference
Width
204 cmReference
207 cmReference
Height
257 cmReference
Shipping weight
3552 kgReference
2WD Clearance (front axle)
71 cmReference
4WD Clearance (front axle)
58 cmReference
Clearance (rear axle)
83 cmReference
Clearance (drawbar)
55 cmReference
Front tire
7.50-18Reference
2WD Rear tire
16.9-34Reference
2WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 7.50-18. Rear: 16.9-34Reference
4WD Standard tires (ag)
Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 16.9-34Reference
4WD Optional tires (ag)
Front: 11.2-24. Rear: 15.5-38Reference
2WD Ag front
27x9.50-15Reference
2WD Ag rear
18.4R26Reference
2WD Lawn/turf rear
18.4-26Reference
Height (hood)
167 cmReference
Height (ROPS)
245 cmReference
Operating weight
4159 kgReference
Ground clearance
48 cmReference
Front tread
152 to 213 cmReference
Rear tread
152 to 227 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
62Reference
80 Serial Numbers
1989
402597Reference
1990
404455Reference
1991
405048Reference
1992
405674Reference
Location:
Instrument panelReference
Test results
Fuel use
18.5 l/hourReference
Max pull
4577 kgReference

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)