Compare/Zetor 9620 vs Zetor Forterra 8641
Search

Zetor 9620 vs Zetor Forterra 8641

Verdict: Zetor 9620 vs Zetor Forterra 8641

The Zetor 9620 and the Zetor Forterra 8641 are both tractors — here is how they stack up on the figures that matter. Zetor Forterra 8641 leads on rated power with 85 hp against 83 hp. Zetor 9620 is the lighter machine (3,370 kg vs 3,949 kg), which helps on soft ground and transport, while the heavier model carries more ballast for traction-limited draft work. Zetor Forterra 8641 holds more fuel (180.2 L vs 106.0 L) for longer stints between fills. Zetor Forterra 8641 is the newer design (1999 vs 1996). In short: choose the Zetor Forterra 8641 for outright pulling power, or the Zetor 9620 if a tighter budget and lighter footprint matter more. Compare the full spec tables below before booking a demo.

Tune the fit score
Tell us about your operation
Fit & specs
Zetor 9620 Tractor
Zetor
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Zetor Forterra 8641 Tractor
Zetor
62
Fit score
Best match
Clear
Rated power
83 hp
85 hp
Confidence
40%
40%
Guide price
Overview
Manufacturer
ZetorReference
ZetorReference
With 16.9-38 rear tires.Reference
liquid-cooledReference
Differential lock
electro-hydraulic rearReference
Variants
9620
2WDReference
9640
4WDReference
Engine
Fuel tank
106.0 LReference
180.2 LReference
Engine
68.6 kWReference
63.4 kWReference
Displacement
4.2 LReference
4.2 LReference
Bore/Stroke
105 x 120 mmReference
105 x 120 mmReference
Power
68.6 kWReference
63.4 kWReference
Fuel system
direct injectionReference
Pre-heating
glow plugsReference
Rated RPM
2200Reference
2200Reference
Starter
electricReference
electricReference
Starter volts
12Reference
12Reference
Torque
297.1 NmReference
Torque RPM
1450Reference
Transmission
Gears
18 forward and 6 reverseReference
24 forward and 18 reverseReference
PTO & Hydraulics
PTO (claimed)
61.9 kWReference
Type
synchromeshReference
synchronizedReference
Pressure
179.3 barReference
Valves
3Reference
Pump flow
60.6 lpmReference
60.0 lpmReference
Steering flow
24.6 lpmReference
Rear Type
IIReference
Control
position and draft controlReference
Rear lift
4082 kgReference
4799 kgReference
Rear PTO
independentReference
independentReference
Clutch
330mm hydraulic dry discReference
hydraulic dry discReference
Rear PTO Type
540/1000 (1.375)Reference
540/1000Reference
Dimensions
Wheelbase
237 cmReference
237 cmReference
Weight
3370 kgReference
3949 kgReference
Front tire
9.00-16Reference
13.6-24Reference
Rear tire
16.9-38Reference
18.4-34Reference
Ag front
9.00-16Reference
Ag rear
16.9-38Reference
Length
396 cmReference
436 cmReference
Width
193 cmReference
Height (cab)
266 cmReference
Ground clearance
52 cmReference
Front tread
142 to 180 cmReference
Rear tread
149 to 180 cmReference
Standard tires (ag)
Front: 13.6-24. Rear: 18.4-34Reference
Height
271 cmReference
Electrical
Ground
negativeReference
negativeReference
Charging system
alternatorReference
Charging amps
55Reference
Battery CCA
1150Reference
Battery volts
12Reference
12Reference
Speeds

Fit score weighs budget, operation size, crop match and data confidence against the details above. It’s guidance, not advice — always confirm with a dealer demo.

Comparing 0
Compare (pick 2+)